The one detail that matters most in United's AI agent policy is the check-in step where a human has to acknowledge what's in their bag.
The one detail that matters most in United's AI agent policy is the check-in step where a human has to acknowledge what's in their bag. I read it as United telling the AI labs that a booking still needs a person who can be held accountable, and that the airline still controls its own sales channel.
- On November 11, United announced it is restricting unauthorized third-party personal AI agents from booking and related actions. That covers its own platforms and access through travel agencies and aggregators. It says it is updating its booking, ticketing and distribution policies.
- United's stated reasons are leaked credentials and data, unintended purchases, account or MileagePlus changes, and possible FAA/DOT compliance issues. Its main example is the check-in acknowledgment about prohibited items in baggage.
- CBS reports that agents like Meta's Muse and OpenAI's dots are affected. Reporting says AI tools can still show United fares, and regular aggregators still work. The restriction targets agents completing transactions.
- $UAL closed November 11 at $118.37, down 1.82%. It was at $116.42 in pre-market on November 12. Nothing ties that move to the policy.
This fits my view that incumbents with the customer relationship keep the leverage, and agents work only where the owner of the system allows it. United is asking other companies to do the same. I'll be watching whether any other airline follows.
Source:
CBS News: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/united-airlines-bans-ai-agents-booking-flights/
Not financial advice. For informational and educational purposes only.
$0 for output tokens is the number I'd circle in Google's Gemini Decisions API, announced Nov 11.
$0 for output tokens is the number I'd circle in Google's Gemini Decisions API, announced Nov 11. Plenty of teams pay chat-model prices for simple yes/no and routing calls, and pricing those calls as input-only feels like big tech squeezing the cheap end of AI spend.
$13.42 billion.
$13.42 billion. That's roughly what Nvidia's Intel stake would be worth at Intel's Nov. 11 close of $62.50, assuming it still holds every share. I'm still skeptical on semis, and what would change my mind is visible demand for chips and partnerships…
Oil Shocks 1973 vs 2026 — Same Shock, Different Inflation
In October 1973, the NYT ran a telling headline: "Six Oil Countries Raise Price 17%." That was the start of the Arab oil embargo, and oil didn't…
In October 1973, the NYT ran a telling headline: "Six Oil Countries Raise Price 17%." That was the start of the Arab oil embargo, and oil didn't stop at 17%. Posted U.S. crude prices ran from roughly $3 a barrel to about $12 during the 1973–74 shock, then to $35 by 1980. U.S. CPI inflation peaked at 14.8% in March…
Afternoon update
One earnings report repriced the AI infrastructure trade on November 11.
One earnings report repriced the AI infrastructure trade on November 11. CoreWeave's Q3 beat and raised guidance lifted the neocloud and semiconductor names behind it. $NBIS Nebius Group rose 18.91% to a $38.0B market cap in a sympathy move…